​How to talk about a painting without saying anything at all?

Of Oblique Incarnation.’ Oil on canvas, 37 x 27.5 inches (94 x70cm). 

'Of Oblique Incarnation.’ My latest completed work makes me wonder what I can say about it without saying anything that might 'lead the witness'?  As you may be aware the paintings in this series rely on how the eyes/mind of the observer interpret them with the intention that the observer should consider what a painting really is and does. I craft the titles of these works as carefully as I craft the paintings themselves to say something but not really anything about the paintings. So perhaps the best way to talk about the painting is to break down the title itself.. Therefore, considering the key components:

Oblique: Not explicit or done in a direct way. Indirect, obscure, devious, underhanded. Denoting any case other than the nominative or vocative.

Incarnation: A particular physical form or state. Embodiment, personification, epitome, manifestation. A concrete or actual form of a quality or concept.
​
So, we are talking about a form with no obvious explanation.
Perhaps this is the only way that I can approach this problem? By taking the title apart in this way I can, hopefully, at least assist the observer in their consideration of the painting in question. Although I suspect that the final sentence will always be: ‘so, we are talking about a form with no obvious explanation.’